Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinicopathological features between fusion-positive MLH1 hypermethylated colorectal cancers, and fusion-negative MLH1 hypermethylated colorectal cancers

From: Comprehensive analysis of oncogenic fusions in mismatch repair deficient colorectal carcinomas by sequential DNA and RNA next generation sequencing

 

MLH1me+ with fusion

(n = 22)

MLH1me+ without fusion

(n = 69)

P#

Age, median, years

72

62

0.013

Gender, n(%)

 Female

13 (59)

37 (54)

0.806

 Male

9 (41)

32 (46)

 

Tumor location, n(%)

 Hepatic flexure

13 (59)

8 (12)

 < 0.001

 Other sites of large intestine

9 (41)

61 (78)

 

  Ileocecum

1 (5)

20 (29)

 

  Ascending colon

5 (23)

16 (23)

 

  Transverse colon

1 (5)

6 (9)

 

  Splenic flexure

1 (5)

2 (3)

 

  Descending colon

1 (5)

5 (7)

 

  Rectosigmoid

0

12 (17)

 

AJCC stage, n(%)

 I

0 (0)

4 (5)

0.925

 II

15 (68)

42 (61)

 

 III

7 (32)

20 (29)

 

 IV

0 (0)

2 (3)

 

Presence of poor differentiated area, n(%)

 Yes

13 (59)

18 (26)

0.009

 No

9 (41)

51 (74)

 

Mucinous differentiation, n(%)

 Yes

9 (41)

25 (36)

0.801

 No

13 (59)

44 (64)

 

Lymphovascular invasion, n(%)

 Yes

10 (45)

23 (33)

0.445

 No

12 (55)

46 (67)

 

Perineural invasion, n(%)

 Yes

3 (14)

5 (7)

 

 No

19 (86)

64 (93)

 
  1. MLH1me+, MLH1 hypermethylated
  2. #P values were based on Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Mann–Whitney tests, whenever appropriate. All statistical tests were two-sided